Translate this page into:
Emerging Frontiers in Antioxidant Therapeutics: From Nanotechnology-Enabled Delivery to Mitochondria-Targeted Interventions

*Corresponding author: Dr. A.A. Hussain Al-Amiery Al-Ayen Iraqi University, Iraq. dr.ahmed1975@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Shaker LM, Al-Amiery A.A. Emerging Frontiers in Antioxidant Therapeutics: From Nanotechnology-Enabled Delivery to Mitochondria-Targeted Interventions. Sci Tech Nex. 2026;2:41-50. doi: 10.25259/STN_19_2025
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate emerging strategies in antioxidant therapy addressing the limitations of traditional antioxidants in managing oxidative stress-related chronic diseases.
Material and Methods
This review analyses literature on antioxidant delivery enhancements through anotechnology, including liposomes, nanoparticles, and stimuli-responsive nanocarriers, and examines mitochondrial-targeted agents and phytochemicals.
Results
Findings highlight the poor bioavailability and targeting of traditional antioxidants such as vitamins C, E, and flavonoids. Novel delivery systems improve antioxidant stability and site-specific release. Mitochondria-targeting agents (MitoQ, SS-31, SkQ1) show clinical promise. Phytochemicals like curcumin and resveratrol exhibit improved efficacy when delivered via nanocarriers.
Conclusion
Advances in nanocarrier engineering, mitochondrial targeting, and activation of endogenous pathways (e.g., Nrf2) define a new era of precision redox medicine, enhancing antioxidant therapy’s therapeutic potential.
Keywords
Drug delivery systems
MitoQ
Nanotechnology
Nrf2 pathway
Oxidative stress

1. INTRODUCTION
Oxidative stress is a common factor behind many diseases and eventually death of cells. It is a condition where the production of reactive oxygen species is faster than antioxidant systems can eliminate them. Oxygen radicals are of utmost importance in cellular signalling process and must be maintained at normal levels. But when they go beyond normal levels, they will cause a bombardment of lipid peroxidation, protein denaturation and DNA damage which will ultimately lead to cellular dysfunction and death. Medicine has for decades depended on simple interventions like vitamins C and E, berry-derived flavonoids, carotenoid from carrots, and pharmaceuticals like N-acetylcysteine.[1-3] Animal studies were hopeful, but clinical trials on humans were not so encouraging. Vitamin C, E, and other antioxidants have been tested in massive supplementation trials without much success. In some cases, high-dose supplementation has even led to an increase in death or disease risk. The cause of this disparity is the delivery limitation of the antioxidants. Most antioxidants are cleared out of blood stream within a few hours of their administration. Many are destroyed before they reach the target tissues. Cell membranes do not allow their entry into the cells. Even if some compounds manage to penetrate the cells, they usually do not reach the area of oxidative damage to exert their protective action. The second generation of antioxidant therapies is more effective as they take advantage of various sophisticated methods to overcome these limitations. In place of high dose vitamin supplementation, the researchers now have delivery vehicles that take the antioxidants right where the disease is located. The body’s own protective genes are opened by the new molecules.[4,5] Recent advances in gene-editing technologies have opened new avenues for modulating oxidative stress at its biological source. Tools such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) /Cas9, base editors, and CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) systems enable precise modification or upregulation of genes involved in antioxidant defence pathways, including SOD2, gluathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase, and components of the Nrf2–Keap1 axis. These strategies allow direct correction of dysfunctional redox-regulating genes, enhancement of endogenous antioxidant capacity, or suppression of pro-oxidant enzymes such as NOX isoforms.[6,7] Although still largely in the experimental stage, gene-editing–based redox interventions illustrate the growing integration of molecular biology with antioxidant therapeutics and support the broader shift toward precision redox medicine depicted in Figure 1. Their potential lies not in acting as standalone antioxidants, but in reshaping cellular resilience against oxidative damage through long-lasting, gene-level modulation. The synthetic enzymes not only mimic natural antioxidant enzymes but also enhance their activity. Nanotechnology further contributes by enabling precise packaging, targeted delivery, and controlled release of therapeutic agents at specific sites and optimal times. The evolution from generic antioxidant supplementation to engineered nanocarriers, gene-editing approaches, and enzyme mimetics reflects a fundamental shift in how redox imbalances are understood and therapeutically addressed. Rather than relying on broad, non-specific strategies that deliver high systemic doses with limited intracellular penetration, modern approaches focus on targeted delivery, controlled release, and modulation of endogenous defence pathways. As illustrated in Figure 1, the field is transitioning from a “take this supplement and hope for the best” paradigm toward precision interventions capable of directing antioxidants to mitochondria, activating cytoprotective signalling networks, and adapting to the biochemical landscape of diseased tissues. This emerging framework of precision redox medicine aims to achieve more consistent therapeutic outcomes, minimise off-target effects, and align interventions with the complexity of chronic and degenerative disease mechanisms.

- Evolution of antioxidant therapeutics from conventional supplementation to precision redox strategies. RNA: Ribonucleic acid, HDR: Homology-directed repair, NHEJ: Non-homologous end joining.
2. HOW ANTIOXIDANTS WORK: CLASSIFICATION AND MECHANISMS
Grasping the sources and mechanisms of antioxidants is pivotal to the design of therapies based on rationality. The classification of antioxidants can be done according to origin (endogenous or exogenous), structure (enzymatic or non-enzymatic), or mechanism (radical scavenging or prevention of radical formation) as shown in Table 1.
| Classification | Sub-type | Examples | How they work |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endogenous | Enzymatic | SOD, Catalase, GPx | Break down reactive species catalytically |
| Endogenous | Non-enzymatic | Glutathione, CoQ10 | Directly neutralize free radicals |
| Exogenous | Dietary | Vitamins C & E, Polyphenols | Scavenge radicals, bind metal ions |
| Functional | Gene inducers | Nrf2 activators | Turn on antioxidant gene programs |
SOD: Superoxide dismutase, GPx: Gluathione peroxidase, CoQ10: Coenzyme Q10
2.1. What the body makes versus what we eat
Every time a redox reaction happens, it is accompanied by the continuous formation of free radicals and reactive oxygen species. The organism has created defence mechanisms to keep the level of these aggressive species under control and thus avoid the risk of losing the cells to oxidative damage. The natural antioxidant system of the body, composed mainly of enzymes, is efficient. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme turns superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide, while catalase (CAT) converts the peroxide to water and oxygen. GPx, on the other hand, removes both hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides from the system. Enzymatic antioxidants function alongside low molecular weight antioxidants with glutathione (GSH) being the most important intracellular antioxidant; coenzyme Q10 that safeguards mitochondrial membranes; melatonin that neutralizes hydroxyl radicals; and metabolic waste products such as uric acid and bilirubin that are reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers. The body continuously modulates these defences, with production during stress being higher and during homeostasis being lower.[8,9] Exogenous antioxidants are mainly provided by food, although dietary supplements and pharmaceuticals are becoming increasingly important sources. The water-soluble vitamin C acts in the prevention of oxidative damage in water-soluble environments, whereas vitamin E, which is fat-soluble, performs the same function for lipids found in cell membranes. The consumption of fruits and vegetables provides the body with polyphenols derived from plants, such as quercetin and resveratrol, and carotenoids, like lycopene. Essential minerals are crucial: selenium is a requirement for GPx activity, zinc supports SOD, and copper is needed for SOD catalysis; however, free copper ions can also cause oxidative damage.
2.2. Enzymes versus small molecules
Enzymatic antioxidants act as catalysts and speed up reactions without being used up. A single enzyme molecule can neutralize thousands of reactive species. Three types of SOD function in different parts of the cell: Cu/Zn-SOD (SOD1) is in the cytoplasm, Mn-SOD (SOD2) is in mitochondria, and extracellular SOD (SOD3) is in the extracellular space. All of them convert superoxide to hydrogen peroxide, but their different locations provide protection across various cellular areas. Catalase is one of the fastest known enzymes and is highly concentrated in peroxisomes. It breaks down hydrogen peroxide at rates over one million molecules per second. GPx works more slowly but is more versatile; it breaks down both hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides that form during oxidative damage to membranes. GPx needs selenium as a cofactor and uses glutathione as a substrate. Other enzymatic antioxidants include thioredoxin reductase, peroxiredoxins, and heme oxygenase-1, each targeting various substrates or cellular compartments.[10,11] Non-enzymatic antioxidants work by sacrificing themselves. Vitamin C donates electrons to neutralize water-soluble radicals, becoming oxidised in the process, though cellular reducing systems can regenerate it. Vitamin E is found in membranes where it stops lipid peroxidation chain reactions. Glutathione is the main intracellular redox buffer, maintaining reducing conditions and serving as a substrate for protective enzymes. Plant polyphenols, which come in many forms, scavenge radicals, bind pro-oxidant metals, and influence cellular signalling pathways.[12,13]
2.3. Three mechanisms of protection
Three major approaches by which antioxidants may protect are depicted in Figure 2. One approach (a simplistic one) is directly radical scavenging. It refers to the giving of an electron or a proton to a very reactive species. This makes the radical more stable and ends further destruction. Vitamins C and E are two such examples. In the same way, polyphenols and flavonoids generally generate stable radicals that do not give rise to chain reactions. The latter purpose is solved by metal chelation. One such reaction is the ability of free transition metals, such as iron and copper, to transform hydrogen peroxide into hydroxyl radicals, one of the most damaging reactive species in biological systems. This form of chemistry, known as Fenton or Haber-Weiss chemistry, takes place normally in living organisms in the presence of both metals and peroxides. Chelators chelate these metals, creating unreactive complexes that prevent radical generation at its origin.[13] The most cumbersome way to enhance the antioxidative potential of the cells is by transcriptional activation. Instead of scavenging individual radicals, some compounds can activate specific genetic programs to increase the overall capacity of the particular cell to mount an antioxidant defence. The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE pathway governs this response process. In times of normalcy, the Keap1 protein binds to a transcription factor called Nrf2 and targets it for degradation; this interaction is disrupted when oxidative stress or specific chemicals modify Keap1. After being launched into the nucleus, Nrf2 binds to DNA at sites called antioxidant response elements and activates dozens of defence genes. Sulforaphane from broccoli sprouts, curcumin, resveratrol, and synthetic agents such as bardoxolone are examples of activators that are produced via this pathway.[14,15] In this way, the cells learn to better defend themselves through increased production of SOD, GPx, glutathione synthesis enzymes, and detoxification systems.

- The three fundamental mechanisms of antioxidant action: direct radical scavenging through electron donation, metal chelation to inhibit radical formation, and transcriptional activation of endogenous antioxidant genes. ROS: Reactive oxygen species.
3. NANOTECHNOLOGY-BASED ANTIOXIDANT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
The conventional antioxidant therapy issues are poor solubility, low tissue targeting, rapid clearance, and poor retention inside cells. Nanotechnology solves these problems by improving the mode of action of antioxidants and providing for their targeted delivery. Researchers can design nanocarriers that control drug release, enhance drug stability, and stimulate selective uptake by affected tissues or cells. Thus, targeted delivery brings more effective treatment and less overall exposure of the organism.[16]
3.1. Nanoformulations enhancing solubility and bioavailability
Usually, a natural antioxidant like curcumin, resveratrol, or quercetin would have tremendous redox-modulating ability; however, these compounds have little water solubility and low absorption when taken orally. Nanometre delivery systems have come up as one solution to this problem. Liposomes are among the early systems. They are composed of one or more biocompatible phospholipid layers encapsulating compounds that can be either water-soluble or fat-soluble, protecting them from degradation and sometimes allowing longer circulation in the body by PEGylation. Animal studies have revealed that liposomal formulations of curcumin show up to 9 times higher bioavailability for neuroinflammation and memory decline than free curcumin.[16,17] SLNs (Solid Lipid Nanoparticles) and NLCs (Nanostructured Lipid Carriers) help antioxidants overcome the real-world challenges of oxidation and enzymatic degradation. SLNs carry a solid lipid core just supported by surfactants, allowing for a sustained release. The presence of liquefied lipid in NLCs increases opportunities for drug loading and shelf life. These systems provide a successful delivery for vitamin E and coenzyme Q10 to treat skin aging and heart disorders.[18,19] Among polymeric nanoparticles, those made from poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) allow very precise tuning of the rate of drug release and attachment of targeting ligands. Quercetin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles demonstrate better neuroprotective effects in stroke and brain injury models. Nanoemulsions are considerable stability mixes of small oil droplets and help in solubilizing poorly water-soluble antioxidants like carotenoids. Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) create nanoemulsions at the gastrointestinal tract, increasing absorption and plasma levels.[20,21] Listed in Table 2 are some major nanocarrier systems, including liposomes, SLNs, PLGA-based polymeric nanoparticles, and nanoemulsions, while playing roles in improving antioxidant solubility, stability, bioavailability, and targeted delivery. These nanotechnologies successfully enhance antioxidative treatments in various disease models overcoming the shortcomings found in traditional formulations.
| Nanocarrier | Base material | Key benefits | Antioxidants | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | Phospholipids | High compatibility, PEGylation | Curcumin, Resveratrol | CNS, inflammation |
| SLNs | Lipid cores | Controlled release, stability | Vitamin E, CoQ10 | Skin, heart |
| PLGA NPs | Biodegradable polymer | Sustained release, functionalisable | Quercetin | Neuroprotection |
| Nanoemulsions | Oil-water interface | High absorption, oral delivery | Carotenoids | Digestive tract |
SLN: Solid lipid nanoparticles, PLGA: Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid), NP: Nanoparticle, CNS: Central nervous system.
3.2. Tissue- and organelle-targeted nanodelivery
Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers constitute a major advancement in targeted antioxidant delivery, as they enable site-specific release in diseased or inflamed tissues while minimizing exposure to healthy cells. These systems are designed to respond to pathological microenvironmental cues, most notably pH, ROS, and temperature. pH-responsive platforms take advantage of the acidic milieu characteristic of tumours and endosomes (pH 4.5–6.8) through acid-cleavable linkers or pH-sensitive polymers that release antioxidants upon reaching these sites.[22-25] ROS-responsive nanocarriers incorporate redox-cleavable structures such as thioketal, boronic ester, or peroxalate moieties that degrade under elevated oxidative stress, providing a smart feedback mechanism in which increased ROS levels trigger drug release; thioketal nanoparticles loaded with curcumin are a representative example showing enhanced efficacy in ROS-rich tumour environments.[26] Thermo-responsive carriers, often based on polymers such as poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM), undergo conformational transitions at defined temperatures, enabling controlled release during hyperthermia and allowing synergistic use with focused ultrasound or external heating modalities.[27] Emerging multi-stimuli systems integrate combinations of ROS, pH, and thermal triggers to achieve even finer control of antioxidant deployment, offering a promising direction for precision-targeted redox therapy. Figure 3 is a schematic representation of major nanocarrier platforms used for site-specific antioxidant delivery. The figure illustrates (i) nanoemulsions designed for improved solubility and controlled release of lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants; (ii) liposomal structures showing multilayered phospholipid organisation enabling encapsulation of diverse antioxidant agents; and (iii) nanoparticles with either inherent antioxidant properties (e.g., melanin-, metal oxide-, lignin-, or carbon-based systems) or functionalised surfaces for targeted delivery, magnetic guidance, and encapsulation of synthetic or natural antioxidants. Together, these systems enhance stability, bioavailability, and microenvironment-responsive release, supporting precision tissue- and organelle-targeted antioxidant therapy.

- Stimuli-responsive nanocarrier systems for targeted antioxidant delivery.
3.3. Limitations and challenges of nanocarrier-based antioxidant delivery
Despite significant progress in nano-enabled antioxidant delivery, several limitations continue to impede clinical translation. A primary concern involves the potential toxicity of nanomaterials, as their small size and high surface reactivity may lead to unintended interactions with immune cells, off-target tissue accumulation, oxidative imbalance, or long-term retention in organs such as the liver and spleen. Manufacturing scalability also poses major challenges; many nanocarrier systems require complex synthesis steps, specialised equipment, and meticulous quality control, making it difficult to achieve reproducible, cost-effective production at industrial scale. Stability issues—including nanoparticle aggregation, premature drug leakage, and degradation during storage—may further compromise therapeutic consistency. In addition, regulatory frameworks for nanomedicine remain underdeveloped, with limited consensus on safety testing requirements, biodistribution evaluation, and long-term toxicity assessment. These scientific, technical, and regulatory barriers highlight the need for cautious interpretation of preclinical results and underscore the importance of rigorous standardisation before nanoformulated antioxidants can be widely adopted in clinical practice.
4. PHYTOCHEMICAL-BASED ANTIOXIDANTS AND POLYPHENOLS
Phytochemicals have entered increasing popular imagination and have been regarded not just as free radical scavengers but also molecules that modulate intracellular signalling, gene expression, and stress response networks. Chemical diversity allows phytochemicals to pursue this activity via interaction with a broad spectrum of molecular targets. Thus, making them highly suited for the mantle of next-generation antioxidant therapeutics.
4.1. Modern perspectives on plant-derived antioxidants
It is Curcumin, the main bioactive compound in turmeric, and phytochemicals that have garnered interest from researchers due to its vast biological properties. Free radicals are scavenged by it, along with many transcription regulators such as Nrf2, NF-κB, and AP-1, enzymes such as iNOS and COX-2, and intracellular enzymes such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and Akt.[28] In its full capacity of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, it has very little clinical use because its oral bioavailability is less than 1% and it is rapidly eliminated from the body. Multiple nanocarrier, phospholipid complex, and analog formulations have been designed to enhance the pharmacokinetics of curcumin. On these reformulations, clinical trials have indicated that such disorders as neuroinflammation, mood disorders, and systemic inflammatory syndromes respond.[28,29] Resveratrol brings a style of suspicion on longevity with the presence of stilbene in grapes and red wine. This molecule activates silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1), key to mitochondrial integrity, stress resistance, and metabolic homeostasis, as well as enhancing the Nrf2-dependent expression of antioxidants genes.[29] Possibly, its biological action is hormetic, where the action is observed at low concentrations by stimulation of adaptive stress responses. But, it is rapidly metabolized and exhibits poor bioavailability, thereby hampering its clinical application; this has spurred interest in the development of resveratrol analogs and delivery vehicles.[29] Quercetin shows antioxidant activity and preferentially induces apoptosis of senescent cells that sustain a microenvironment for chronic inflammation and tissue aging through mechanisms such as metal ion chelation, free radical scavenging, and activating the Nrf2 pathway. Preliminary and preclinical aging models suggest that quercetin, in combination with dasatinib, significantly ameliorates physical function and proinflammatory cytokine expression.[30,31] Other important phytochemicals are:
-
-
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) from green tea gives protection to neurons in metabolic regulation.
-
-
Sulforaphane is an intense activator of the Nrf2 pathway present in crucifers.
-
-
Pterostilbene: higher bioavailability than resveratrol
-
-
Anthocyanins from berries are considered cardiovascular and cognitive health agents.
Natural source overlooked research could still reveal new antioxidant compounds.[32,33]
4.2. Synergy and combinatorial effects among polyphenols
Studies exhibit combinations of polyphenols exert greater effects in comparison to singular compounds because of redox-based cooperation, enzyme activities, and bioavailability. Possible mechanisms of synergy include:
-
-
Recycling of oxidised antioxidants
-
-
Activation of complementary signalling pathways
-
-
Inhibiting metabolic enzymes that otherwise would limit absorption
This suggests that the Mediterranean diet, with its polyphenols complexly mixed in wine, olive oil, fruits, and vegetables, spells out how natural food products tend to offer higher biological effects when consumed together rather than alone. Several synergistic mixtures illustrate this point. For instance, quercetin combined with EGCG exhibits potent anticancer synergy by promoting cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Similarly, resveratrol combined with pterostilbene offers superior benefits for cognitive and metabolic health. Another notable example is curcumin with piperine, where piperine inhibits glucuronidation in the liver, thereby increasing curcumin’s bioavailability by an estimated 2000%.
Generally, whole food extracts display higher potency than phenolics or any other isolated compounds; thus, the so-called matrix effect is said to exist. The set-up provides further rationale for standardised botanical formulations that retain native-type interactions amongst themselves. Researchers have begun to employ metabolomics and network pharmacology in attempts to shed light onto the interaction networks that govern polyphenol synergy and that may then allow for rational bioactive combination designs.[34-36]
4.3. Innovative extraction technologies for phytochemical antioxidants
The actions of phytochemical antioxidants depend on the natural activity of the compounds and on their extraction methods. These methods account for extract yield, purity, and stability. Traditional or old-school means-at-day extraction by using solvents mainly at high temperature-may destroy the heat-sensitive antioxidants or sometimes leave solvent residues. Some of these methods are considered greener and better choices: Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) uses CO₂ above its critical point (31°C, 74 bar). In some respects, this acts as a gas in diffusion and as a liquid in solvation. It is an extraction technique in the absence of oxygen and organic solvents, suitable for lipophilic compounds such as tocopherols and carotenoids.[37,38] These co-solvents may be helpful in broadening the variety of phytochemicals extracted: ethanol being one. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) uses acoustic cavitation to degrade plant matrices and assist mass transfer. UAE extraction takes place at a lower temperature, better preventing thermal degradation and promoting a higher extraction rate for polyphenols and flavonoids.[39] Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), on the other hand, selectively heats polar plant tissues to speed up extraction while maintaining bioactivity. Rapid processing time and good application with green solvents are also offered. Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) gives polyphenols the free run by using pectinases and cellulases to degrade the cell walls of plants.[40]
5. MITOCHONDRIA-TARGETED ANTIOXIDANTS
Although mitochondria-targeted antioxidants such as MitoQ, SkQ₁, and SS-31 show promise, clinical outcomes have been inconsistent. Several trials report modest functional improvements, while others detect limited or no significant benefit despite strong preclinical data. Variability in patient populations, disease heterogeneity, and delivery barriers contribute to these mixed results. This disparity highlights the need for larger, well-controlled clinical studies to clarify efficacy and safety.
5.1. Mitochondria as sources and sites of ROS damage
Mitochondria perform a dual function in cellular life and death-they are a cellular power generator on the one side and a major reactive oxygen species producing centre on the other. During oxidative phosphorylation, electrons occasionally escape from the electron transport chain (mainly complexes I and III) and reduce oxygen prematurely to superoxide radicals. Normally, mitochondrial antioxidants (MnSOD and glutathione peroxidase) scavenge these ROS. From pathological states (aging, metabolic syndrome, neurodegeneration), maybe the excessive production of ROS generally goes beyond their scavenging mechanisms, leading to damage to mtDNA, lipid peroxidation (especially cardiolipin), protein dysfunction, and impaired adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production.[41]
5.2. Novel mitochondria-targeted antioxidants
The classic antioxidants like vitamins C and E had very poor accumulation in mitochondria. Therefore, mitochondria-targeted novel compounds were developed to localise in this organelle and scavenge ROS at its source. Figure 4 of the attached image from the document shows how the agents get accumulated in mitochondria to hamper ROS-induced cellular damage.[41] Table 3 lists some important mitochondrial antioxidants such as MitoQ, SkQ1, SS-31, and MitoTEMPO along with their targeted strategies, status of development, and clinical or preclinical applications. These compounds are consigned to accumulate within mitochondria with the aim of removing oxidative damage and increasing bioenergetics to counteract diseases linked to mitochondrial dysfunction.

- Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and their mechanisms of action. ROS: Reactive oxygen species; MitoQ: Mitoquinone; SkQ1: Plastoquinonyl decyltriphenylphosphonium.
| Compound | Targeting mechanism | Development stage | Therapeutic focus | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitoQ | TPP-conjugated ubiquinone | Phase II clinical trials | Cardiovascular, Parkinson’s disease | Lipophilic cation (TPP⁺) drives mitochondrial accumulation; lipid ROS scavenger. |
| SkQ₁ | TPP + plastoquinone | Approved (Russia) | Age-related ocular and systemic aging | Ophthalmic use validated; targets mitochondrial membranes. |
| SS-31 | Cardiolipin-binding peptide | Advanced clinical trials | Ischemia-reperfusion injury, aging syndromes | Enhances ATP production, prevents apoptosis by stabilizing membranes. |
| MitoTEMPO | Mitochondria-penetrating SOD mimetic | Preclinical development | Oxidative stress-related diseases | Mimics MnSOD, scavenges superoxide in matrix. |
SOD: Superoxide dismutase, TPP: Triphenylphosphonium, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, ATP: Adenosine triphosphate, MitoQ: Mitoquinone, SkQ1: Plastoquinonyl decyltriphenylphosphonium, MnSOD: Manganese superoxide dismutase.
As seen in Figure 4, MitoQ, SkQ₁, etc., utilise triphenylphosphonium (TPP) moieties for translocation across mitochondrial membranes. From there, they go on to scavenge lipid ROS and prevent cardiolipin oxidation-an event that finally initiates mitochondrial apoptosis. Unlike these TPP conjugates, SS-31 binds to cardiolipin on the inner membrane and maintains the structural organisation, thus improving bioenergetics. XJB-5-131, an emerging peptide-mimetic, scavenges matrix-localised ROS by virtue of its peculiar peptide backbone and antioxidant groups.[42,43]
5.3. Therapeutic impact in age-related and metabolic diseases
Mitochondrial antioxidants therapeutics intervene at an upstream level in the pathological cascade. By protecting mitochondrial function, they avert downstream effects such as inflammation, insulin resistance, neurodegeneration, and tissue aging. Major Therapeutic Advantages include:[44-47]
-
Increasing Insulin Sensitivity: MitoQ and SkQ₁ are believed to reduce mitochondrial ROS production in adipocytes and skeletal muscles, which in turn accounts for improvements in insulin signalling and glucose uptake.
-
Protecting Muscle from Age-Related Decline: Both SS-31 and its congeners inhibit mitochondrial dysfunction and muscle wasting in aged animals, thus enabling muscle function to be maintained.
-
Abating Neurodegeneration: A considerable potential for applications in Parkinson’s models is afforded since MitoQ and XJB-5-131 protect dopaminergic neurons against oxidative stress.
-
Cardioprotective Action: Shown in clinical trials, SS-31 prevents ischemia reperfusion injury by preservation of mitochondrial membrane potential and avoidance of calcium overload.
Note that Table 4 displays major antioxidants in many physiological and pathological conditions with their respective modes of action and clinical evidence. While some antioxidants seem to show promise, such as CoQ10 in early Parkinson’s disease and curcumin in rheumatoid arthritis, the rest show rather inconsistent and weak evidence against their claim, depending on formulation and dosage, and at times even the stage of the disease. The table arranges antioxidants based on their disease causality, facilitating a broader perspective on their redox-modulatory functions and therapeutic relevance.[48-51]
| Condition | Key antioxidants | Mechanism | Clinical evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular | Vitamin C, E, Resveratrol, Flavonoids | Reduces LDL oxidation, vascular inflammation | Mixed; flavonoids and resveratrol show some benefit |
| Neurodegeneration | Curcumin, CoQ10, Melatonin, Vit E | Stabilizes mitochondria, reduces protein aggregation | CoQ10 beneficial in early PD; Vit E inconclusive |
| Cancer prevention | EGCG, Curcumin, Sulforaphane, Selenium | Detox enzymes, apoptosis induction, angiogenesis inhibition | Preclinical promising; mixed clinical efficacy |
| Skin health | Vit C, Vit E, Astaxanthin, CoQ10 | UV-ROS scavenging, collagen synthesis | Topical Vit C beneficial; oral less clear |
| Metabolic disorders | Resveratrol, Curcumin, Quercetin, Berberine | Enhances insulin signalling, reduces AGEs | Curcumin & resveratrol modest HbA1c reductions |
| Ocular health | Lutein, Zeaxanthin, Vit A, Zinc | Filters blue light, protects RPE | Effective in early AMD; not advanced stages |
| Liver diseases | Silymarin, NAC, Vit E, Glutathione | Reduces lipid peroxidation, improves redox | Vit E effective in NASH; mixed liver data |
| Reproductive health | CoQ10, Vit E, L-Carnitine, Zinc | Supports gamete quality, mitochondrial energetics | CoQ10 improves sperm parameters; limited in women |
| Muscle physiology | NAC, Vit C, CoQ10, Polyphenols | Reduces exercise-induced ROS | CoQ10 improves strength; high-dose antioxidants may impair adaptation |
| Immune function | Vit C, Vit A, Zinc, Selenium | Redox modulation, immune cell support | Vit C reduces ICU mortality; inconsistent in colds |
| Aging & Frailty | CoQ10, Resveratrol, Polyphenols | Preserves telomeres, reduces mitochondrial ROS | CoQ10 + selenium reduce mortality; human lifespan effects unclear |
| Inflammatory diseases | Curcumin, Quercetin, Resveratrol, Omega-3 | Inhibits NF-خ؛B, IL-6, TNF-خ± | Curcumin beneficial in RA; limited for IBD |
| Renal disorders | Curcumin, NAC, Selenium | Inhibits oxidative glomerular injury | Curcumin reduces fibrosis; NAC slows CKD progression |
| Respiratory disorders | NAC, Quercetin, Curcumin | Reduces airway ROS, mucus secretion | NAC inhalation improves FEV1; oral forms less effective |
| Gastrointestinal health | Curcumin, Sulforaphane | Preserves gut barrier, modulates microbiota | Curcumin + mesalamine induces remission in UC |
| Skeletal health | Vit K, Resveratrol, Vit C | Inhibits osteoclasts, promotes osteoblasts | Polyphenols support bone health; limited RCTs |
ROS: Reactive oxygen species, RCT: Randomized controlled trial, RPE: Retinal pigment rpithelium, LDL: Low-density lipoprotein, NAC: N-acetylcysteine, CKD: Chronic kidney disease, AGE: Advanced glycation end-products, AMD: Age-related macular degeneration, NASH: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease, TNF: Tumour necrosis factor, NF: Nuclear factor, FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second, IL: Interleukin, PD: Parkinson’s disease
6. CONCLUSION
The antioxidant therapeutics were once shaped with a wide brush approach of non-specific supplementation of vitamins and polyphenols; while it is now evolving into the era of precision redox medicine. Early attempts at antioxidant therapy were met with failure due to the low bioavailability of agents, their rapid clearance from systemic circulation, and poor intracellular targeting. This situation, however, is now changing with the coming-of-age of nanotechnology, organelle targeting, and molecular biology techniques that could be spearheading the designing of next-generation antioxidant therapies with better pharmacokinetic behaviour and disease specificity. Targeting mitochondria with antioxidant agents-from MitoQ, SkQ₁, SS-31 to MitoTEMPO-is a significant breakthrough since the reactive oxygen species (ROS) are being neutralized directly at their site of generation. Once in the bloodstream, these agents act to restore mitochondrial integrity, thereby protecting bioenergetics and reducing apoptotic activities across the spectrum of therapeutics for age-related diseases, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, and metabolic diseases. Nanocarrier systems such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and stimuli-responsive platforms further improve antioxidant efficacy by ensuring site-specific release in oxidative microenvironments, thereby reducing systemic toxicity. Further, phytochemicals from plants-the likes of curcumin, resveratrol, and quercetin-have been redesigned to overcome their inherent limitations and exhibit synergism when used in combination via nanoformulations. These compounds mediate some of the key cellular signalling pathways such as Nrf2-Keap1-ARE, thereby increasing the endogenous antioxidant defences rather than direct ROS scavenging. Taken together, nanotechnology coupled to mitochondrial targeting and phytochemical synergy offers a bright future for antioxidant-based therapies. Going forward, attention should be dedicated to the rigorous clinical translation of mitochondria-targeted and nano-enabled antioxidants, rational design of combinatorial therapies, and integration of omics and systems biology approaches for personalized redox interventions. Hence, chronic and degenerative disease complexities are taken care of as well with safe, efficacious, and tailored antioxidant interventions worthy of modern medicine.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent
Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that no AI tools were used in generating the textual content of the manuscript, except for language enhancement. Figure 4 was revised using AI-based illustration tools.
REFERENCES
- Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2021;2021:9877170.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Cells. 2020;9:1849.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;9:505.
- Recent Advances in Phytochemical Research. 2025;10:49.
- Journal of Functional Foods. 2023;106:1-14.
- Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology. 2024;397:3477-91.
- [PubMed]
- Food Hydrocolloids. 2024;146:109221.
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25:7827.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Nutrients. 2020;12:3224.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:1841.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Biomolecules. 2024;14:670.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;12:834.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2003;57:145-55.
- [PubMed]
- Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2024;60:653.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2020;696:108662.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Journal of Neurochemistry. 2007;102:1095-104.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2024;15:1379389.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2023;12:2301592.
- Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2020;88:5.
- Biomedicines. 2021;10:37.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Ageing Research Reviews. 2024;99:102393.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2018;9:1358.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;23:106.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2022;114:416-21.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cancers. 2023;15:1023.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Medicine in Drug Discovery. 2022;15:100134.
- Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2021;3:100107.
- The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway: From mechanism to medical applications. In: Oxidative Stress Oxidative Stress. Elsevier; 2020. p. :125-47.
- [Google Scholar]
- Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 2025;24:421-44.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Frontiers in Physiology. 2020;11:956.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;16:1020.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2020;30:528-36.
- Iranian journal of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. 2020;19:612-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nutrients. 2021;13:2028.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Animal Science Papers and Reports. 2024;42:5-33.
- Official Journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology. 2018;23:1130-5.
- Biomolecules. 2022;12:1087.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2014;38:2896-906.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Foods (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;12:3142.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Current Opinion in Food Science. 2021;40:144-56.
- Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2018;7:107.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Cells. 2022;11:288.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2018;71:1056-63.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2015;20:14487-503.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2007;47:629-56.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2014;19:121-32.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 2003;125:49-58.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. 2002;34:162-71.
- Nature. 2006;443:787-95.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antioxidants. 2023;12:753.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Cells. 2025;14:511.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]

